Post a Comment
It will be curious to see how competing HTML heavy platforms try to distinguish themselves, yet provide opportunity for portability that seems to be the underlying premise behind an HTML based application platform (once you get beyond base line familiarity).
If Tizen and WebOS can come to some reasonable common ground in terms of platform features as exposed via HTML5, then app writers can target both, and device makers can focus on other issues than app availability in terms of platform choice. But if they're still racing to distinguish themselves in to oblivion, I don't know what else could be done.
I have the complete opposite feeling. Mozilla seems to be very serious about boot2gecko and is investing heavily in it. They also seem to be the only ones that make webapps a number one priority.
Tizen, webos, ms phone, chrome(os) all seem like dead ends to me. Look at what google is doing with 'webapps' only making them work in chrome and using plugins like nacl. Look at what ms is doing with 'webapps' where they only run on IE.
Watch out for Mozilla's marketplace where they will give you an apps experience with webapps that should be able to work on any browser/device.
The only cool things are the hardware interaction api's which everyone of those projects has written differently, and will not work on anyone else's os unless they write support for it.
The only apps that will work on anyone else's device are those webpages that are already in existence now. Why do you need a marketplace for them? Isn't that just a limited version of Google? Just a terrible waste of Mozilla's scarce resources, IMHO.
So the people in Mozilla claiming otherwise are dumb?
The huge success of apps should give you clue about why making a webpage into an app is a good idea.
So the people in Mozilla claiming otherwise are dumb?
I don't think they are claiming this. As it would be stupid. How else are operating systems and browsers already written going to support api's that are only now being written? And yes, I don't think anyone is going to implement their apis as everyone has their own version of doing the same thing.
The huge success of apps should give you clue about why making a webpage into an app is a good idea.
Do you remember the start of the app? Steve Jobs said himself, you write the apps in HTML 5 for the iphone. Then apparently he saw the light and introduced the app store with the iphone 3G. People want native.
I don't think Steve Jobs had the best interests of users in mind$$$. I also don't think that people will know the difference between apps and webapps. How would they know?
I guess really the only true differentiator they could come up with is raw dhtml / canvas performance, that's one of Android's uncovered flanks.
By delivering order of magnitude better performance they could have a selling point and maybe tempt some app houses to pour more energy into their mobile web interfaces.
And the pain to make CSS+HTML+JavaScript work in a consistent state across multiple browsers and operating systems.
Just in case you should find yourself with money to burn, used Pre 3s are being auctioned on eBay Germany for around 150 Euros at the moment
http://www.ebay.de/ccg/HP-Pre-3-8GB-Schwarz-Ohne-Simlock-Smartphone...




