Post a Comment
And now it's time to release the freaking Windows 8 desktop with a freaking Start Button. Or we will write our own Start Buttons, so there will be a madness, we will have hundreds of different Start Buttons and Start Menus. "
Oh, for chrissakes, stop your whining. There's a free replacement for the Start menu.
http://www.stardock.com/products/start8/
Really?
Most enterprise projects make use of Oracle systems.
Many young geeks seem to think that IBM is a all Linux love, when in fact back in the 70's and early 80's it was as bad or worse than Microsoft.
On the time-sharing days, most languages were somehow even more tied to the OS than nowadays. IBM had a big responsibility on these state of affairs.
It is all about the money. There is no good or evil in big corporations.
Many people do, because IBM does contribute a lot to kernel development.
But like any company, they do it, because they want Linux to run properly on the servers they sell, that is all.
Depends on one thinks about getting money. Anyway, when a company shows some geek love, by releasing open source stuff, that does not make them automatic good.
Except this is clearly not a case of them trying to assert themselves. It bears all the hallmarks of someone taking something crucial away to test the other party in the relationship. They're exercising their power and will try again.
Except this is clearly not a case of them trying to assert themselves. It bears all the hallmarks of someone taking something crucial away to test the other party in the relationship. They're exercising their power and will try again. "
The desktop is a shrinking market. That's why MS is pulling back on support for it. Seriously, if you were faced with a shrinking market, you would do the same.
The desktop market seems to be shrinking because the market itself has expanded and diversified. "
I'm not sure how that distinction matters. The desktop is therefore shrinking... hence... [/q]
It's not shrinking in the way that a company like Microsoft has to "get out of it".
The desktop market seems to be shrinking because the market itself has expanded and diversified. "
I'm not sure how that distinction matters. The desktop is therefore shrinking... hence... [/q]
It's not shrinking in the way that a company like Microsoft has to "get out of it". [/q]
I'm glad you aren't running their business -- because you'd run it into the ground.
A company does something, users say they don't like it, so the company accomdates them, and then those same users bash the company as "caving" (a perjorative) rather than "accomdating". Why use the perjorative to describe this? This is why companies are reluctant to accomodate demands, for nobody wants to be known as a "caver".
"Microsoft Relents On Metro-Only Visual Studio Express"
http://developers.slashdot.org/story/12/06/08/1948211/microsoft-rel...
That's a lot better than "caves". There's something strange going on when slashdot is more reasonable regarding a Microsoft story than OSNews is. :p
And allow booting into the desktop.
If metro is so great then let people choose it. Good software doesn't need to be forced.
Oh and I just finished a post for Windows 8 defenders:
http://www.techbroil.com/2012/06/windows-8-sucks.html
http://www.techbroil.com/2012/06/windows-8-sucks.html
Nice rant, except for the part about power users. We, my friend, are a dying breed. If you can appease the millions and millions of tech tards out there, I think that pissing off a small percentage of power users is an acceptable trade-off to these companies. Or, at least that is the only conclusion I can come up with, considering how they seem to be doing anything and everything they can to alienate us. It is what I call the 'war on power users'.
Hell, I would've been happy just to have tabs in Windows Explorer, but all we get is the f**king ribbon. Sure, that's not a problem at home, where I can use whatever I want, but at work, where the computers are on lock down, I'm pretty much forced to use whatever comes with the OS. At least they could've thrown us a small bone.
Edited 2012-06-08 23:38 UTC
If you'll keep thinking about and calling them like that, they will be happy to alienate you, seeing it as for their benefit.
(plus, you could be probably a "tech tard" in the eyes of some greybeard, or just somebody from different field of technology)
likely already posted here, still: http://www.channelregister.co.uk/2012/06/07/win8_enterprise_yesno/
so perhaps some MS managers do still have some plain old common sense and stupid decisions might be reverted ?
Tom UK
I agree with this decision, but note that Microsoft was going to keep VS2010 Express available and supported anyway, and hobbyists could use those to target pre-Windows 8 OS.
VS11 Express does have the advantage that the languages are merged into one package. VS2010 Express separated C#, VB, and C++ whereas they all come in the same SKU with VS11 Express (though still it looks like there'll be separate Express SKUs for targetting Metro and Desktop (and Web, but that was already separate in VS2010 Express).





