Post a Comment
The renders doesn't exhibit any hump which suggests that the camera will be nothing like that one in 808.
Let's hope the label means more than just a refreshed sensor everybody else has. Nokia should finally enjoy fruits of its technology excellence in photo department.
Edited 2012-08-31 11:48 UTC
Lumia is still a bit more chunky than e.g. Galaxies but still having the optics shrinked 2 times means order of magnitude worse result, so while it might be still better, it's nowhere near PureView magic. I hope the won't tarnish that brand trying to easily exploit it for newer handset promotion. PureView is the only unique Nokia technology left.
It was the same with N8 and N9. N9 had 3/4 pixel count of n8 but the quality was in a different league.
I wonder how many people there actually are that would rather have a bulkier phone in exchange for better optics and therefore better image quality. All the manufacturers these days seem to focus on making as slim phones as ever possible and the general populace seems to be perfectly happy with that, but if the phones were bulkier the extra space could be used for larger battery, better optics, more storage and so on.
Well, I really wanted the Nokia N8 due solely to the fine optics, and especially the xenon flash bulb, but by the time I was ready to get a smartphone (and switch providers, too) it had become too hard to find locally.
That phone has quite a bit of extra bulge to support the optics.
I was rather talking about the sensor.
At least for bigger cameras the sensor run hot for movies and while somewhat smaller in this phone so is the volume around it. I don't know what kind of cooling it needs.
Also all processors will require cooling since they run of electricity and the electricity will make the chips hotter. They may not require active cooling though. Somehow the heat will spread though.
There's also the chance Pureview actually make some other chips run hotter since the sensor actually use those 36+ (or so) mpx even in video mode whereas most digital cameras only use a few of the pixels in video mode. Close to 40 mpx * 30 or 60 fps becomes quite a bit of data.
It looks like my Lumia 800, which looks very nice. I think it's good to make every new Lumia look at bit like the previous one, making them easy to recognize.
The only thing I don't like about the Lumia is the hidden mini USB connector needed to charge the device. it's behind a flap that's not easy to open. With this system there is also no way to put it in a dock that also charges it.
I for one happen to like that thing in my wife's N9. While it's fragile it leaves a much better impression than bulky rubber corks other producers use.
That phone is all about design without compromises (I know, an Apple fanboy attitude) so you either love or hate it.
Edited 2012-08-31 15:25 UTC
It's very frustrating. These look like great phones, and I only wish they were running MeeGo (I'm sure there's nothing wrong with WinPhone8, it's just a personal preference).
Unfortunately I'm not yet convinced Jolla will offer a serious, viable, long-term answer or whether the alternatives' ecosystems are really worth switching for.
Completely agree there..
I would be very satisfied with Android on it though.
I _want_ a Nokia phone, especially if their phones look this nice, but I don't want WinPhone _at all_.
Quite annoying.
Maybe, just maaaaybe, in the future I'll buy a Nokia phone, root it and install CM on it instead. If ever possible.
But before that, no WinPhone for me.
Even if it's good?
Android only feels half-open anyway considering most manufacturers screw it up. Open-source against the manufacturers, rather closed and lacking cool hacks against the consumer.
The has probably improved somewhat lately and even if (close to) all the phones except Nexus ones are closed by design at least you can open them yourself. Somewhat.
Edited 2012-09-01 15:21 UTC
I'm not touching WinPhone or iOS, no matter if they are good or not. I simply don't like the companies behind them.
Unfortunately, that means even if Android get's ported to Nokia phones, I'll still be very hesitant to buying one even if just to replace WinPhone with Android. This because I don't like giving Microsoft (or Apple) my money.
And Barnes and Noble says "Thanks!" for all of the Android patent extortion money [ever collected] in exchange for dropping the patent abuse lawsuit.
No new products from this partnership so far. Not even any PR announcements. It's been 3 months!
'Sup widdat?
Edited 2012-09-01 18:04 UTC
Yeah, I know.. Not much I can do about that but bitch and complain and, ofcourse, _not_ give any _more_ money to them.
What better alternatives are there?
iOS? *laughs*
WebOS? nope
BlackBerry? no thanks
MeeGo? nope, not yet anyways, maybe later if Jolla succeeds
Bada? nope, they killed it
Infact, Android is currently the _only_ realistic alternative if you want a good smartphone but don't want Microsoft or Apple products.
Btw, do Microsoft really collect softwarepatent money from Android devices sold in countries that don't have softwarepatents? That seems very wrong.
Hasn't broken on mine. I don't know if people have just had a bad batch of N900s or if they've been too rough on the USB-port or what. Or maybe I've just gotten one from the lucky batch.
That's the scary thing about the ruling: even a TV infringes on the design patents, even though it predates the patents by decades.
As much as I dislike Apple and their behaviour I have to say that Samsung is also partially to blame for this ruling: both Apple and Samsung ruled out technically-adept people from the jury in the hopes that the jury would misunderstand things and uphold the parties' patents claims, ie. it was a gambit on both Apple's and Samsung's part and for Samsung the gambit wasn't worth it -- Samsung was clearly hoping the jury would award them Lots of Money(TM) for the patents. Greed got the better of Samsung and now, unless the appeals court overturns the verdict, the whole U.S. consumer base has to pay for it.
The TV thing is a mischarcterization of the ruling. Samsungs devices infringed on a totality of the design of the iPhone from the shape, to the icons, to the colors, to the design of the box. As a whole the products infringed, not individually.
Did the Jury make mistakes? Of course. The verdict form and subject matter was complicated (in fact an article on OSNews even pointed it out) but can it be taken care of by a Judge or on appeal? Of course. We're talking a few million in the scheme of a billion dollars, so it isn't like there was a grand conspiracy.
This villainization of the Jury is disgusting.
That's one instance, they've been called nationalists or xenophobic (an American jury ruling against a Korean company) and they've had their words twisted to suggest they didn't follow instructions. Really stupid and childish crap like that.
It went from "there's no way the jury will toss out all this prior art!" to "something must be wrong with the Jury" to "the Judge is biased". Just a bunch of nonsensical red herrings. Blame everyone except Samsung.





