Post a Comment
I use ninite a lot and wanted to see if this was similar or better. However, the download from http://0install.net/install-windows.html didn't start. I will try again later.
And it feels REALLY counterintuitive to download an installer from a website/product called 0install
The download worked fine for me. But so far (at least on Windows) I'm not impressed at all. The "catalog" has a bare handful of programs, several of which are already available via Ninite. The only advantage I see over the latter service is the ability to run the program before downloading. However, that's a pretty slim advantage until the catalog is expanded beyond a few games and random PC tools.
The site hosting the Windows version seems to be having trouble. However, there's a mirror here:
http://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/zero-install/0install/1.14... zero-install-1.14.2.exe (SourceForge)
Thanks for the mirror, but I saw that version 1.14 was there just 1 hour ago and hasn't been downloaded by anyone (you put it there especially for me?)
All newer versions seem only for Linux, so it seems clear where the focus of this project is.
And again, a zero-installer that requires an installer and cannot even provide that simply screams "stay away, we don't want you as a user"
Just installed it anyway (lunchbreak) and what I saw was a nice intro video that showed me all I needed to know.
then I pressed "Refresh list" and nothing showed up. I tried a few more times but still nothing happened (except for "Loading catalog from server..." of course)
I give up
I've also linked it from the front page. It still says zero downloads now, so I guess sf.net stats don't update in real-time.
The Windows version generally lags by a month or two, although it also has extra features (e.g. the catalog stuff). It's not quite the same as the POSIX version, although it shares some of the code and can process the same packages.
Many installers (pip, easy_install, cabal, maven, etc) work this way, requiring you to install the installer before you can use it.
There was a project to change that (dynamically generating an installer for the user's platform), but it's not ready:
http://0install.net/0bootstrap.html
0install probably mostly makes sense where you've got a lot of packages to install. For example, current users include Ryppl (managing hundreds of C++ modules), Sugar (desktop environment) and ROX (desktop environment). Or, if you have lots of versions (e.g Armagetron publishing frequent snapshot builds).




