Post a Comment
I'm a small scale user of FreeBSD, having it running on about half a dozen servers and a desktop, but still I'm amazed by its stability. It's good to see FreeBSD hold its own in a clustering environment bigger than just a test lab. Go FreeBSD!
From the article, this is currently running 4.8, I can not wait to see the follow up article when 5.2 or 5.3 gets implemented. I suspect that 5.3 will be in the stable branch. Hoping 5.2 is going to be in the stable branch (can only hope).
If anyone is curious; 4.9 is the current stable release. Currently 5.x is a "New Technology" release (aka bleeding edge). 5.2 is in RC1 status.
that was a very cool and interesting read! nice to see a worth os-news submition as opposed to the setting up apache/mysql submission....
interesting to read about the high hardware attrition and some of the faults of the tyan motherboard/bios.
i've heard sun fan ranting about how much better sun equipment is not because of there performance but because of their durability. well i still can't agree or disagree with them (the closest i've got to hpc is a cluster of 3 durons) i can at least now see what the issue would/could be.
These are two different articles in this headline (the clister, and snmp/rrdtool). I wrote the latter and just read the former and I'm seriously impressed. I'm wondering if I'm worthy enough to piggyback on the success of the former!
FWIW, http://guinness.cs.stevens-tech.edu/~jschauma/hpcf/">some are using http://www.netbsd.org/">NetBSD recent" rel="nofollow">http://mail-index.netbsd.org/tech-cluster/2003/11/06/0004.html">... posting to the <a href="http://www.netbsd.org/MailingLists/#tech-cluster">tech-cluster&l... mailing list.
I only submitted (didnt write it)the story about the FreeBSD cluster. But your story has plenty of value. Never shortchange your self and never under estimate *bsd.
FYI: Good info Anonymous about netbsd.



