Post a Comment
I installed NetBSD 1.6.2 for the first time a week ago. It's not bad. It took a bit of getting used to the different package system.
It didn't feel quite as refined (from a useability perspective) as the FreeBSD ports/package system. For example, if I wanted to do easy remote installs of packages, I had to define a PKG_PATH variable to point to the NetBSD server (I sure didn't expect this). Where as on FreeBSD I could just use "pkg_add -r" and everything was just sorta auto-configured out of the box.
I also managed to break a number of installed packages (not sure how) by trying to install packages that caused others to upgrade. I was under the impression that package views (if that's what they call them) were supposed to fix a lot of the strange package conflicts.
NetBSD was nice, but just didn't feel as responsive as FreeBSD. I suppose I'll wait until 2.0 before I make too many judgements.
This is great news for SFU users. Thanks to the NetBSD team!
> For example, if I wanted to do easy remote installs of
> packages, I had to define a PKG_PATH variable to point to
> the NetBSD server (I sure didn't expect this).
I installed 1.6.2 me too few days ago and by doing:
pkg_add ftp://ftp.netbsd.org/etcetc
PKG_PATH was set up automatically
I didn't find thunderbird on the NetBSD 1.6.2 package collection, did you find it ?
/Andrea
Off Topic:
I was thinking to find mount_smbfs (it was imported from FreeBSD) there while I read that only it will be available with the 2.0, or current 
Interop Systems ported pkgsrc a while ago and all their packages for Interix now comes in pkgsrc format.
This version is very stable.
an update: The Interop systems version appears to be derived from the OpenBSD/FreeBSD implementation - not the NetBSD version.




