posted by Adam S on Mon 30th Jul 2007 15:24
Conversations As of right now, I've removed the limits on scoring comments, meaning there is no longer a "+5" and "-5" limit to posts on OSNews. Posts can now be elevated or voted down pretty much infinitely.
http://www4.osnews.com/top
Also, to coincide with this, I will be extending the number of elligible moderations SIGNIFICANTLY to offset the potential large number of upvotes or downvotes. This is all very experimental. I have major changes planned for the moderation system of OSNews, and this is just step 1.
Previous ConversationNext Conversation
Comments:
Comment by Almafeta
by Almafeta on Mon 30th Jul 2007 15:32 UTC
Almafeta
Member since:
2007-02-22

the number of elligible moderations

What does this mean?

Reply Score: 1

RE: Comment by Almafeta
by Adam S on Mon 30th Jul 2007 15:37 in reply to "Comment by Almafeta"
Adam S Member since:
2005-04-01

The number of people with comment votes and the number of comment votes. Both have just been expanded by a lot.

Reply Score: 1

sweet!
by helf on Mon 30th Jul 2007 18:40 UTC
helf
Member since:
2005-07-06

I just noticed this! I was modding up a post and when the page reloaded he was at +6 ;)

cool.

Reply Score: 2

Thanks!
by RandomGuy on Mon 30th Jul 2007 23:13 UTC
RandomGuy
Member since:
2006-07-30

It just feels great to vote a comment to +6 ;)
Kudos for taking the challenge and reworking the voting system!

Reply Score: 2

Comment by Anonymous Penguin
by Anonymous Penguin on Tue 31st Jul 2007 06:45 UTC
Anonymous Penguin
Member since:
2005-07-06

In reply to a previous question from you: I can't mod admins, neither in v3 nor in v4. In v4 the moderation option is simply invisible for me when it comes to admins.

Another matter: in my profile I have: 82% positive moderations. This never changes, which is a bit odd considering that I hardly ever mod anybody down.

Reply Score: 2

RE: Comment by Anonymous Penguin
by Adam S on Tue 31st Jul 2007 13:25 in reply to "Comment by Anonymous Penguin"
Adam S Member since:
2005-04-01

I will check on both for you in a minute.

Reply Score: 1

RE: Comment by Anonymous Penguin
by Adam S on Tue 31st Jul 2007 13:32 in reply to "Comment by Anonymous Penguin"
Adam S Member since:
2005-04-01

In reply to a previous question from you: I can't mod admins, neither in v3 nor in v4. In v4 the moderation option is simply invisible for me when it comes to admins.


I'm looking into this. This will be fixed (at least in v4) today.

Another matter: in my profile I have: 82% positive moderations. This never changes, which is a bit odd considering that I hardly ever mod anybody down.


88 unknown votes (first months of moderation, before we record direction)
131 down mods
997 up mods

997/1216 = 82%

You need several more up mods - more than 50 straight - before it will switch to 83%.

Reply Score: 1

Anonymous Penguin Member since:
2005-07-06

Thanks so much for clarifying both issues.

131 down mods? Wow, this surprises me, really :-)

Reply Score: 2

Adam S Member since:
2005-04-01

Thanks so much for clarifying both issues.

131 down mods? Wow, this surprises me, really :-)

It's true. I verified it myself. Most of them are old and were applied to anonymous comments.

Reply Score: 1

Anonymous Penguin Member since:
2005-07-06

Yeah, must have been idiotic comments which managed to annoy me :-)
Yes, this makes sense, thanks. If I remember correctly posting as anonymous was abused a lot.

Reply Score: 2

RE: Comment by Anonymous Penguin
by Adam S on Tue 31st Jul 2007 14:57 in reply to "Comment by Anonymous Penguin"
Adam S Member since:
2005-04-01

Can you try to mod an admin for me now?

Reply Score: 1

Anonymous Penguin Member since:
2005-07-06

Yes!!! I just modded Thom up in v4.

Reply Score: 2

Adam S Member since:
2005-04-01

Two lines in the code were out of order. It worked, but then it reset the moddable status.

Reply Score: 1

Anonymous Penguin Member since:
2005-07-06

OK, I see (well, sort of :-) )

Reply Score: 2

Doesn't this mess up the averages?
by sbergman27 on Tue 31st Jul 2007 14:41 UTC
sbergman27
Member since:
2005-07-24

I understand that this is only the first step. But doesn't this pretty seriously skew the whole average comment score thing? Some people have thousands of posts limited to +5, and new people are coming in and getting 25+ on their posts. Isn't that going to make the old timers look bad for a long time to come?

Reply Score: 2

Adam S Member since:
2005-04-01

We ditched "average" score in v4, since it was meaningless to begin with. 1 comment at +5 gives you a +5 average. 200 at 3 is a MUCH better track record, but a worse average. So we scrapped it altogether.

Reply Score: 1

sbergman27 Member since:
2005-07-24

Ah! That's good. Yes, it is pretty useless. I only mentioned it because I thought it was going from useless to totally misleading. ;-)

Reply Score: 2

Adam S Member since:
2005-04-01

It is. ;)

Reply Score: 1

sbergman27 Member since:
2005-07-24

If you *did* want to retain some sort of "score" for users, an exponentially smoothed weighted moving average might be the best way to do it:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exponential_smoothing

The wikipedia article is a bit dry. I actually prefer John Walker's explanation in his essay "The Hacker's Diet".

http://www.fourmilab.ch/hackdiet/www/hackdiet.html

New users' scores could be proloaded with some number of virtual comments at some value. Perhaps the overall system average. As they post more, the effect of the loading would gradually go away. Existing users could be preloaded with the same number of posts at their current average.

Just a thought. And it might be fun to implement! ;-)

Reply Score: 2