posted by google_ninja on Wed 8th Aug 2007 22:33
Conversations Saw it disappear and come over here to see what was up. While I agree with Adam that the score was warped, it did at least provide *some* indication of the persons posting history. If someone with a score of -3 rips me a new one, it is a big difference then someone with +3.

Not saying that it was perfect or anything, just wondering if anything is in the works to replace it.
Previous ConversationNext Conversation
Comments:
Not really.
by Adam S on Wed 8th Aug 2007 23:08 UTC
Adam S
Member since:
2005-04-01

I figured that "Member Since" was a better indicator, because rather than something totally objective (and as we discussed, biased towards the majority opinion of our readers), a static indicator of "seniority" was probably a better measure of worth.

Do you have any ideas? Maybe a (X/Y) where X is number of comments and Y is average score, but that's a little too bloated and bulky I think.

Reply Score: 1

RE: Not really.
by google_ninja on Wed 8th Aug 2007 23:28 in reply to "Not really."
google_ninja Member since:
2006-02-05

The thing is, seniority doesn't necessarily equal maturity or insightfulness. It would take some thought, but what you guys should probably do is come up with some sort of formula to score users. As you said in the other thread, an average of 2 on 300 posts means alot more then an average of 2 on 5 posts, and the score should reflect that.

Another thought I had while reading the conversation about Moulineuf is that the same way that someone with a high average score gets an automatic +1, maybe someone with an exceptionally low score should get an automatic -1. They would still show up for most people, but could be modded away easier.

Anyways, keep up the good work Adam ;)

Reply Score: 2

RE[2]: Not really.
by Adam S on Wed 8th Aug 2007 23:39 in reply to "RE: Not really."
Adam S Member since:
2005-04-01

the same way that someone with a high average score gets an automatic +1, maybe someone with an exceptionally low score should get an automatic -1. They would still show up for most people, but could be modded away easier.


I'm open to that. Let me look into what that would take.

Reply Score: 1

RE: Not really.
by Tyr. on Thu 9th Aug 2007 02:19 in reply to "Not really."
Tyr. Member since:
2005-07-06

I figured that "Member Since" was a better indicator, because rather than something totally objective (and as we discussed, biased towards the majority opinion of our readers), a static indicator of "seniority" was probably a better measure of worth.

Do you have any ideas? Maybe a (X/Y) where X is number of comments and Y is average score, but that's a little too bloated and bulky I think.


I'm a fan of the moving average proposed by sbergman27 ( here http://www4.osnews.com/permalink?c267 ) Seems like a good system because scores evolve over time, trolls can redeem themselves and vice versa, and it smooths outliers (anomalous scores high or low).
Probably isn't easy to implement though.

"Member since" makes me think of Slashdot and the whole lower id-numbers are better thing.

Reply Score: 2

RE[2]: Not really.
by google_ninja on Thu 9th Aug 2007 03:16 in reply to "RE: Not really."
google_ninja Member since:
2006-02-05

Thats actually the kind of thing I had in mind. It would take a bit of work, but that would actually give a good indication of the users history.

Reply Score: 2

OS creation articles
by Almafeta on Fri 10th Aug 2007 11:21 UTC
Almafeta
Member since:
2007-02-22

Wa hey, if you get the go-ahead, I may have to join you in writing an article or two sometime. ;)

I wonder how many OS hobbyists there are here?

Reply Score: 2