posted by Adam S on Fri 7th Sep 2007 20:44
Conversations For a long time, your comments on OSNews were labeled with your average "score." This was a meaningless stat - someone with 1 post rated 5 appeared a better user than 1 with 1000 posts at 3. So, [link]http://www4.osnews.com/conversation/46b8cfca|| ||after a heated debate[/link], I removed the score. That's when I was introduced to the "[link]http://www4.osnews.com/permalink?c267|| ||moving average[/link]."

Effective immediately, the number after your username in comments is your "moving average." It's the average of your last 25 comments (or however many comments you have if you have less than 25). This number will change as you post and as you are moderated. It is much fairer, as it rates your value recently; a poor past can be redeemed, and a highly ranked user must continue to submit insightful comments to stay at the top. The number 25 may change, and if it does, it will be posted here. But in the meantime, you should see these scores in stories and conversations.
Previous ConversationNext Conversation
Comments:
Floating Point Extremism
by elsewhere on Sat 8th Sep 2007 03:06 UTC
elsewhere
Member since:
2005-07-13

Seems like an interesting idea, will watch to see how it unfolds.

One thing, though, is I think you may want to round up the results when presenting them. I saw one of the posts in the KDE4 thread displayed as: quenturi (1.6428571428571)

Makes my head spin... ;)

Reply Score: 2

Dubious
by Michael on Sat 8th Sep 2007 11:59 UTC
Michael
Member since:
2005-07-01

As long as this doesn't discourage people from posting the sort of conversational replies that are unlikely to score any points.

Reply Score: 2

Good Idea
by google_ninja on Mon 10th Sep 2007 00:09 UTC
google_ninja
Member since:
2006-02-05

Alot of us who have been around awhile can flame to our hearts content, and due to our history, it does not effect our score. This addresses that issue really well.

Im not sure that 25 is the best number though. IMHO what you should do is see what the average comments posted per day is, and then choose a number based on that. I know there have been periods where I have posted 25 times in 2-3 days, easy. IMHO, the average of the last week is a bit short. It should be closer to the average of the last few months (maybe 3 or 4)

Reply Score: 2

RE: Good Idea
by Alex Forster on Mon 10th Sep 2007 04:06 in reply to "Good Idea"
Alex Forster Member since:
2005-08-12

"see what the average comments posted per day is, and then choose a number based on that"

That's clever, agreed.

Reply Score: 1

RE: Good Idea
by Adam S on Mon 10th Sep 2007 17:19 in reply to "Good Idea"
Adam S Member since:
2005-04-01

On days when users post, they post, on average, between 1-3 posts, depending on the user. Of course, this is because most times they post just once, and other times they post 15 times in a day. I do not want them to be able to "adjust" their average after one good day, because a troll could simply just post a bunch of comments in a bland story and curve their average up. I suppose it shoiuld actually be a higher number.

Reply Score: 1

RE[2]: Good Idea
by google_ninja on Mon 10th Sep 2007 21:34 in reply to "RE: Good Idea"
google_ninja Member since:
2006-02-05

yeah, if the average is 3 posts a day, the score is reflecting the average of the last week. I would say put it at least the last month (which would be an average of the last 85 posts), or even higher.

It is a very good idea though. Keep up the good work, v4 is looking real nice ;)

Reply Score: 2

RE[3]: Good Idea
by Adam S on Tue 11th Sep 2007 15:42 in reply to "RE[2]: Good Idea"
Adam S Member since:
2005-04-01

Good thought. It now takes the last 86 entries, drops the lowest one, and calcs the remaining 85. You get one free pass - the rest count.

Reply Score: 1

Hehe...
by Almafeta on Wed 12th Sep 2007 13:52 UTC
Almafeta
Member since:
2007-02-22

Interesting, but unfortunately signifying nothing, since you have no idea what your initial score is going to be when you post...

Reply Score: 1

Oh man!
by SReilly on Wed 12th Sep 2007 15:34 UTC
SReilly
Member since:
2006-12-28

And there was me trying to get my average above 3! All those suck up comments and toadying for nothing now ;-)

Reply Score: 2