posted by setec_astronomy on Tue 16th Dec 2008 10:39
This is my second attempt to get a verification whether this behaviour is a bug or a feature (previous attempt was here:
http://osnews.com/conversation/48f48bd1/Bug_flat_comment_view
)
If I try to read the last page of comments for the story
"Does Windows Need a Linux Package Manager?"
with my usual settings (10 comments per page, flat, oldest first),
then the url looks something like this
http://osnews.com/comments/20648?view=flat&threshold=0&sort=comment...
for the (as of this writing) 94 comments. For 93 comments, the offset read 97, I guess we can say that there is a pattern.
The result is, that the 10th comment page contains only a fraction of comments, due to the strange offset. If I manually change the offset to 90, everything works as expected.
Question: Why is the offset set to 96 and not 90?
(The problem occurs only when comments approach 100, I have so far not tried different numbers of comments per page to p
Post a Comment
RE: Conv != Bug Reports
by setec_astronomy on Tue 16th Dec 2008 20:20
in reply to "Conv != Bug Reports"
Sorry for (mis)using the conversation page for a bug report. To my defense: I did so after seeing other bugs being reported here too (yeah, weak defense, I know).
So: Should I send a detailed bug report via Email to you
(as indicated in the contact page on osnews?), or is there some other place to drop issue reports?
Thanks in advance & appologies for hijacking the conversation area.
RE[2]: Conv != Bug Reports
by Adam S on Tue 16th Dec 2008 21:17
in reply to "RE: Conv != Bug Reports"
RE[3]: Conv != Bug Reports
by setec_astronomy on Tue 16th Dec 2008 21:23
in reply to "RE[2]: Conv != Bug Reports"





0 