<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://www.osnews.com/rss4#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews</title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2012, David Adams</copyright>
		<generator>OSNews version 4</generator>
		<webMaster>donotreply@osnews.com (Adam Scheinberg)</webMaster>
		<managingEditor>donotreply@osnews.com (Thom Holwerda)</managingEditor>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 01:08:47 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<ttl>120</ttl>
		<item>
			<title>Understanding the /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin Split</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/25556/Understanding_the_bin_sbin_usr_bin_usr_sbin_Split/</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/story/25556/Understanding_the_bin_sbin_usr_bin_usr_sbin_Split/</guid>
			<description>Finally something really interesting to talk about. If you've used UNIX or any of its derivatives, you've probably wondered why there's /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin in the file system. You may even have a rationalisation for the existence of each and every one of these directories. The thing is, though - all these rationalisations were thought up after these directories were created. As it turns out, the real reasoning is pretty damn straightforward.</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 20:39:09 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Thom Holwerda)</author>
			<category>General Unix</category>
			<osnews:numComments>135</osnews:numComments>
			<osnews:related>http://www.osnews.com/topics/22</osnews:related>
			<osnews:kind>News</osnews:kind>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>The /bin/true Command and Copyright</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/25552/The_bin_true_Command_and_Copyright/</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/story/25552/The_bin_true_Command_and_Copyright/</guid>
			<description>"One of the fun examples among all the copyright fuss is the extreme example of copyright claims made by AT&amp;T some time in the 1980s. It's the /bin/true program. This is a dummy' library program whose main function is to make it easy to write infinite loops (while true do ...) in shells scripts. The 'true' program does nothing; it merely exits with a zero exit status. This can be done with an empty file that's marked executable, and that's what it was in the earliest unix system libraries. Such an empty file will be interpreted as a shell script that does nothing, and since it does this successfully, the shell exits with a zero exit status. But AT&amp;T's lawyers decided that this was worthy of copyright protection." Three blank lines. Copyrighted. You can't make this stuff up.</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 14:10:46 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Thom Holwerda)</author>
			<category>General Unix</category>
			<osnews:numComments>26</osnews:numComments>
			<osnews:related>http://www.osnews.com/topics/22</osnews:related>
			<osnews:kind>News</osnews:kind>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Xv6: A Simple Unix-like Teaching Operating System</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/25319/Xv6_A_Simple_Unix-like_Teaching_Operating_System/</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/story/25319/Xv6_A_Simple_Unix-like_Teaching_Operating_System/</guid>
			<description>Way back in 2002, MIT decided it needed to start teaching a course in operating system engineering. As part of this course, students would write an exokernel on x86, using  Sixth Edition Unix (V6) and John Lions' commentary as course material. This, however, posed problems.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 21:26:52 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Thom Holwerda)</author>
			<category>General Unix</category>
			<osnews:numComments>39</osnews:numComments>
			<osnews:related>http://www.osnews.com/topics/22</osnews:related>
			<osnews:kind>News</osnews:kind>
			<osnews:submitter>edwin</osnews:submitter>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Dennis Ritchie: The Other Man Inside Your iPhone</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/25239/Dennis_Ritchie_The_Other_Man_Inside_Your_iPhone/</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/story/25239/Dennis_Ritchie_The_Other_Man_Inside_Your_iPhone/</guid>
			<description>The groundbreaking work he did with Ken Thompson led to the operating system behind everything from set-top boxes to the iPhone, but </description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 17:28:53 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (David Adams)</author>
			<category>General Unix</category>
			<osnews:numComments>6</osnews:numComments>
			<osnews:related>http://www.osnews.com/topics/22</osnews:related>
			<osnews:kind>News</osnews:kind>
			<osnews:submitter><a href="http://www.osnews.com/user/twitterfire">twitterfire</a></osnews:submitter>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Dennis Ritchie, Creator of UNIX and C, Dead at 70</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/25232/Dennis_Ritchie_Creator_of_UNIX_and_C_Dead_at_70/</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/story/25232/Dennis_Ritchie_Creator_of_UNIX_and_C_Dead_at_70/</guid>
			<description>Twitter is currently buzzing about the death of Dennis Ritchie, the visionary creator of UNIX and C, among other things. We hope it's just a false rumor. Story developing, we will be updating. Update: Unfortunately, it seems to be confirmed. Rob Pike, co-creator of the Plan 9 and Inferno OSes, who has worked with Ritchie in the past, and he's currently working for Google's GO language, posted this.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 00:28:43 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Eugenia Loli)</author>
			<category>General Unix</category>
			<osnews:numComments>78</osnews:numComments>
			<osnews:related>http://www.osnews.com/topics/22</osnews:related>
			<osnews:kind>News</osnews:kind>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Using the /proc Filesystem</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/24478/Using_the_proc_Filesystem/</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/story/24478/Using_the_proc_Filesystem/</guid>
			<description>"The proc filesystem is a special filesystem found on most UNIX-based systems.
It holds a great deal of information, in ASCII format, most of which is not very friendly to the average user. [...] I've made a list of some of the files i find to be of most use."</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 17:01:03 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Hadrien Grasland)</author>
			<category>General Unix</category>
			<osnews:numComments>10</osnews:numComments>
			<osnews:related>http://www.osnews.com/topics/22</osnews:related>
			<osnews:kind>News</osnews:kind>
			<osnews:submitter><a href="http://www.osnews.com/user/Petur">Petur</a></osnews:submitter>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Unix Creators Ken Thompson, Dennis Ritchie Win Japan Prize</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/24322/Unix_Creators_Ken_Thompson_Dennis_Ritchie_Win_Japan_Prize/</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/story/24322/Unix_Creators_Ken_Thompson_Dennis_Ritchie_Win_Japan_Prize/</guid>
			<description>Today, Ken Thompson and Dennis Ritchie, the two Bell labs scientists which began creating the Unix operating system in 1969, have been named as winners of the 2011 Japan Prize for information and communications.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2011 15:12:22 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Hadrien Grasland)</author>
			<category>General Unix</category>
			<osnews:numComments>0</osnews:numComments>
			<osnews:related>http://www.osnews.com/topics/22</osnews:related>
			<osnews:kind>News</osnews:kind>
			<osnews:submitter><a href="http://www.osnews.com/user/jimmy1971">jimmy1971</a></osnews:submitter>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>How the Atari ST Almost Had Real Unix</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/24287/How_the_Atari_ST_Almost_Had_Real_Unix/</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/story/24287/How_the_Atari_ST_Almost_Had_Real_Unix/</guid>
			<description>What would have happened if the ST had run a BSD based UNIX rather than TOS and GEM? "To run Unix effectively we needed some hardware that was very fast, that was simple enough to put into a minor spin of the STâs memory controller with little project risk, and that would still provide some kind of memory relocation and protection. The ability to have separate address spaces to isolate processes would be good, too."</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 19:18:20 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (David Adams)</author>
			<category>General Unix</category>
			<osnews:numComments>1</osnews:numComments>
			<osnews:related>http://www.osnews.com/topics/22</osnews:related>
			<osnews:kind>News</osnews:kind>
			<osnews:submitter><a href="http://www.osnews.com/user/henderson101">henderson101</a></osnews:submitter>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Novell To Retain UNIX Copyrights</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/24067/Novell_To_Retain_UNIX_Copyrights/</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/story/24067/Novell_To_Retain_UNIX_Copyrights/</guid>
			<description>Good news: the UNIX copyrights owned by Novell will not fall in the hands of Microsoft as part of the IP purchase by Redmond. "Novell will continue to own Novell's UNIX copyrights following completion of the merger as a subsidiary of Attachmate," states John Dragoon, Chief Marketing Officer at Novell. Yeppers.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 24 Nov 2010 22:50:16 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Thom Holwerda)</author>
			<category>General Unix</category>
			<osnews:numComments>8</osnews:numComments>
			<osnews:related>http://www.osnews.com/topics/22</osnews:related>
			<osnews:kind>News</osnews:kind>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Hewlett Packard Superdome Demo Day</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/22411/Hewlett_Packard_Superdome_Demo_Day/</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/story/22411/Hewlett_Packard_Superdome_Demo_Day/</guid>
			<description>I had the pleasure earlier this month of attending a demo day at HP's Cupertino campus to commemorate the ten year anniversary of the Superdome server, see what's new in the high-end server market and learn about what's going on with HP-UX.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 22:44:51 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (David Adams)</author>
			<category>General Unix</category>
			<osnews:numComments>30</osnews:numComments>
			<osnews:related>http://www.osnews.com/topics/22</osnews:related>
			<osnews:kind>Feature</osnews:kind>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>HP-UX Gets Biannual Face-Lift</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/22248/HP-UX_Gets_Biannual_Face-Lift/</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/story/22248/HP-UX_Gets_Biannual_Face-Lift/</guid>
			<description>"Hewlett-Packard is rolling out Update 5 for the HP-UX Unix operating system that runs its Itanium and PA-RISC lines of Integrity and HP 9000 servers, keeping to its pattern of two updates per year for its flagship operating system. As has been the case with the prior HP-UX updates, the changes are important to existing HP-UX shops, but they're probably not going to cause a stampede of buyers for HP-UX systems. It's no different with the updates to IBM's AIX or Sun Microsystems' Solaris Unixes do."</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 18:54:47 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Thom Holwerda)</author>
			<category>General Unix</category>
			<osnews:numComments>6</osnews:numComments>
			<osnews:related>http://www.osnews.com/topics/22</osnews:related>
			<osnews:kind>News</osnews:kind>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>UNIX Network Performance Analysis</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/22141/UNIX_Network_Performance_Analysis/</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/story/22141/UNIX_Network_Performance_Analysis/</guid>
			<description>Do you know what to do when the performance of your UNIX network and the speed at which you can transfer files or connect to services suddenly comes to a stop? How do you diagnose the issues and work out where in your network the problems lie? This article looks at some quick methods for finding and identifying performance issues and the steps to start resolving them.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 22:31:17 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Thom Holwerda)</author>
			<category>General Unix</category>
			<osnews:numComments>0</osnews:numComments>
			<osnews:related>http://www.osnews.com/topics/22</osnews:related>
			<osnews:kind>News</osnews:kind>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Unix Celebrates 40 Years</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/22031/Unix_Celebrates_40_Years/</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/story/22031/Unix_Celebrates_40_Years/</guid>
			<description>"The computer world is notorious for its obsession with what is new - largely thanks to the relentless engine of Moore's Law that endlessly presents programmers with more powerful machines.
Given such permanent change, anything that survives for more than one generation of processors deserves a nod.
Think then what the Unix operating system deserves because in August 2009, it celebrates its 40th anniversary. And it has been in use every year of those four decades and today is getting more attention than ever before."</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 21:37:34 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Jordan Spencer Cunningham)</author>
			<category>General Unix</category>
			<osnews:numComments>19</osnews:numComments>
			<osnews:related>http://www.osnews.com/topics/22</osnews:related>
			<osnews:kind>News</osnews:kind>
			<osnews:submitter><a href="http://www.osnews.com/user/kernpanic">kernpanic</a></osnews:submitter>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>35 Years of the UNIX Time-Sharing System</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/21759/35_Years_of_the_UNIX_Time-Sharing_System/</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/story/21759/35_Years_of_the_UNIX_Time-Sharing_System/</guid>
			<description>"Earlier this year, people in many places wrote about the 40th anniversary of the moment Ken Thompson sat down and started to work on UNIX (which is actually in August). In fact, UNIX celebrates another birthday this year, even though on a slightly smaller scale. In July 1974, exactly 35 years ago, Dennis Ritchie and Ken Thompson published the first version of their seminal paper The UNIX Time-Sharing System in the Communications of the ACM."</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 20:19:55 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Thom Holwerda)</author>
			<category>General Unix</category>
			<osnews:numComments>9</osnews:numComments>
			<osnews:related>http://www.osnews.com/topics/22</osnews:related>
			<osnews:kind>News</osnews:kind>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Unix Turns 40: Past, Present, Future of a Revolutionary OS</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/21617/Unix_Turns_40_Past_Present_Future_of_a_Revolutionary_OS/</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/story/21617/Unix_Turns_40_Past_Present_Future_of_a_Revolutionary_OS/</guid>
			<description>Gary Anthes offers an overview history of Unix forty years since Ken Thompson banged out the first version in assembly language for a wimpy DEC PDP-7 minicomputer, spending one week each on the operating system, a shell, an editor, and an assembler. Also included in the package are a year-by-year time line of its evolution, and profiles of Unix giants David Korn, Rick Rashid, and Gordon Bell.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 21:50:33 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Thom Holwerda)</author>
			<category>General Unix</category>
			<osnews:numComments>29</osnews:numComments>
			<osnews:related>http://www.osnews.com/topics/22</osnews:related>
			<osnews:kind>News</osnews:kind>
			<osnews:submitter><a href="http://www.osnews.com/user/snydeq">snydeq</a></osnews:submitter>
		</item>
	
	</channel>
</rss>

