<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://www.osnews.com/rss4#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews</title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2012, David Adams</copyright>
		<generator>OSNews version 4</generator>
		<webMaster>donotreply@osnews.com (Adam Scheinberg)</webMaster>
		<managingEditor>donotreply@osnews.com (Thom Holwerda)</managingEditor>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 04:06:01 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<ttl>120</ttl>
		<item>
			<title>Why Microsoft developers need a style guide</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/25597/Why_Microsoft_developers_need_a_style_guide/</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/story/25597/Why_Microsoft_developers_need_a_style_guide/</guid>
			<description>What your interface communicates to users can be just as important as what your software does, writes Fatal Exception's Neil McAllister in discussing the latest edition of the 'Microsoft Manual of Style,' a style guide aimed at designers and developers who create Microsoft software, as well as those who write about it. 'The gist of much of Microsoft's advice is that a user's relationship with computer software is a unique one, and it's important to craft the language of software UIs accordingly,' McAllister writes. 'Occasionally, Microsoft's recommendations verge on the absurd. For example, you might not think it necessary to admonish developers to "not use slang that may be considered profane or derogatory, such as 'pimp' or 'bitch,'" but apparently it is.'</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:23:46 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (OSNews Staff)</author>
			<category>Graphics, User Interfaces</category>
			<osnews:numComments>3</osnews:numComments>
			<osnews:related>http://www.osnews.com/topics/47</osnews:related>
			<osnews:kind>News</osnews:kind>
			<osnews:submitter><a href="http://www.osnews.com/user/snydeq">snydeq</a></osnews:submitter>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Wayland Preparing For 1.0 Stable Release</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/25563/Wayland_Preparing_For_1_0_Stable_Release/</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/story/25563/Wayland_Preparing_For_1_0_Stable_Release/</guid>
			<description>This weekend at FOSDEM 2012 what Kristian Hogsberg is expected to say in Brussels will surprise many of you: Wayland 1.0 is gearing up for release as their first stable release. Wayland [a new X server for Linux] is supposed to be ready to take on the Linux desktop world.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 23:50:33 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (David Adams)</author>
			<category>Graphics, User Interfaces</category>
			<osnews:numComments>44</osnews:numComments>
			<osnews:related>http://www.osnews.com/topics/47</osnews:related>
			<osnews:kind>News</osnews:kind>
			<osnews:submitter>Michael</osnews:submitter>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Simplicity vs. Customizability in Desktop Design</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/25303/Simplicity_vs_Customizability_in_Desktop_Design/</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/story/25303/Simplicity_vs_Customizability_in_Desktop_Design/</guid>
			<description>In the commercial software world, user interfaces are generally designed by one group.  Like Microsoft for Windows or Apple for Mac OS.  Those desktop environments were designed by one company who did things like user testing and statistical analysis to try and make the desktop they thought would work best.  Linux is different.  Large groups definitely DO perform user testing and statistical analysis, but one group can also say "Here's what we want" and, if they have the ability to code it, their idea comes into being.  It's pretty amazing, when you think about it.  Linux lets people create what they want.  If you don't like what's out there, fork it!  Or start from scratch!  You're in control!</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 09:46:09 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (OSNews Staff)</author>
			<category>Graphics, User Interfaces</category>
			<osnews:numComments>77</osnews:numComments>
			<osnews:related>http://www.osnews.com/topics/47</osnews:related>
			<osnews:kind>Editorial</osnews:kind>
			<osnews:submitter>Allen Boyles</osnews:submitter>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>The Future of User Interfaces is Brainwaves</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/25225/The_Future_of_User_Interfaces_is_Brainwaves/</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/story/25225/The_Future_of_User_Interfaces_is_Brainwaves/</guid>
			<description>Within the last few days we read the news about Apple's Siri AI personal assistant, and about a brain implant that lets monkeys control virtual limps &amp; feel virtual objects. I believe that if someone is to also combine a few more technologies (e.g. high-res eyeware, appropriate operating system changes), we will be looking at the next user interface revolution, after the inventions of the computer mouse and touch interfaces.</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2011 19:55:53 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Eugenia Loli)</author>
			<category>Graphics, User Interfaces</category>
			<osnews:numComments>48</osnews:numComments>
			<osnews:related>http://www.osnews.com/topics/47</osnews:related>
			<osnews:kind>Editorial</osnews:kind>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>TOSP : Multi-Monitor Survey v2 Results</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/25153/TOSP_Multi-Monitor_Survey_v2_Results/</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/story/25153/TOSP_Multi-Monitor_Survey_v2_Results/</guid>
			<description>"Like for the previous survey, there aren't much answers anymore after about one week, so I think it's time to thank everyone and close the survey, in order to publish the results along with some interpretation." As before, everything is released under Creative Commons CC0 license.</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 10 Sep 2011 16:25:52 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Hadrien Grasland)</author>
			<category>Graphics, User Interfaces</category>
			<osnews:numComments>12</osnews:numComments>
			<osnews:related>http://www.osnews.com/topics/47</osnews:related>
			<osnews:kind>News</osnews:kind>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>TOSP : Multi-monitor survey v2</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/25130/TOSP_Multi-monitor_survey_v2/</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/story/25130/TOSP_Multi-monitor_survey_v2/</guid>
			<description>"As mentioned before, the original multi-monitor survey had some serious flaws, which means that its results should be used with caution. I don't know if I can gather people around this again, but I wanted to try an updated, much cleaned up version of the survey, with results distributed in public domain just as before. Here it is." (from The OS-periment)</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 04 Sep 2011 15:40:29 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Hadrien Grasland)</author>
			<category>Graphics, User Interfaces</category>
			<osnews:numComments>7</osnews:numComments>
			<osnews:related>http://www.osnews.com/topics/47</osnews:related>
			<osnews:kind>News</osnews:kind>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>TOSP : Multi-Monitor Survey Results</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/25129/TOSP_Multi-Monitor_Survey_Results/</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/story/25129/TOSP_Multi-Monitor_Survey_Results/</guid>
			<description>"Okay, it's been about one week and there are not much answers anymore, so it's time to thank everyone who participated, close this survey, and publish the results, along with some interpretation." Everything is released under Creative Commons CC0 license, so anyone interested, please help yourself.</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 04 Sep 2011 12:39:44 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Hadrien Grasland)</author>
			<category>Graphics, User Interfaces</category>
			<osnews:numComments>21</osnews:numComments>
			<osnews:related>http://www.osnews.com/topics/47</osnews:related>
			<osnews:kind>News</osnews:kind>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>TOSP : Survey on Multi-Monitor Setups</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/25109/TOSP_Survey_on_Multi-Monitor_Setups/</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/story/25109/TOSP_Survey_on_Multi-Monitor_Setups/</guid>
			<description>"Recently, Brendan and I have been arguing about what can reasonably be expected from a multi-monitor OS (among other graphical stack things). We've reached the conclusion that nothing replaces real-world user data. So anyone interested, please answer this survey about multi-monitor setups and expectations ! (Results will be published here once the amount of answers has reached a steady state, I'd say in a month at worst)" (Source)</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2011 09:50:51 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Hadrien Grasland)</author>
			<category>Graphics, User Interfaces</category>
			<osnews:numComments>35</osnews:numComments>
			<osnews:related>http://www.osnews.com/topics/47</osnews:related>
			<osnews:kind>News</osnews:kind>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>AMD's Open-Source Radeon Driver After Four Years</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/25083/AMD_s_Open-Source_Radeon_Driver_After_Four_Years/</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/story/25083/AMD_s_Open-Source_Radeon_Driver_After_Four_Years/</guid>
			<description>While the BFS scheduler is getting ready to celebrate its second birthday, in just three weeks AMD's open-source Radeon graphics driver strategy for Linux will be turning four years old . . . which has ended up being a game-changer in the Linux world. AMD continues to support open-source hardware enablement on their latest graphics processors and recently even hired more developers to work on the code and documentation. How far have they come though in four years?</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2011 19:09:19 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (David Adams)</author>
			<category>Graphics, User Interfaces</category>
			<osnews:numComments>34</osnews:numComments>
			<osnews:related>http://www.osnews.com/topics/47</osnews:related>
			<osnews:kind>News</osnews:kind>
			<osnews:submitter>Michael</osnews:submitter>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Designing Command-Line Interfaces</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/25039/Designing_Command-Line_Interfaces/</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/story/25039/Designing_Command-Line_Interfaces/</guid>
			<description>Since we're on a CLI kick today, here's an "attempt at presenting some of the most important guidelines for CLI design."</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2011 17:42:44 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (David Adams)</author>
			<category>Graphics, User Interfaces</category>
			<osnews:numComments>23</osnews:numComments>
			<osnews:related>http://www.osnews.com/topics/47</osnews:related>
			<osnews:kind>News</osnews:kind>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Ode to the Command Line</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/25035/Ode_to_the_Command_Line/</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/story/25035/Ode_to_the_Command_Line/</guid>
			<description>A couple of days ago I read a blog post by Stephen Ramsay, a professor at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln and a Fellow at the Center for Digital Research in the Humanities.  In it, he mentions that he has all but abandoned the GUI and finds the command line to be "faster, easier to understand, easier to integrate, more scalable, more portable, more sustainable, more consistent, and many, many times more flexible than even the most well-thought-out graphical apps."  I found this very thought-provoking, because, like Ramsay, I spend a lot of time thinking about "The Future of Computing," and I think that the CLI, an interface from the past, might have a place in the interface of the future.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2011 16:08:01 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (David Adams)</author>
			<category>Graphics, User Interfaces</category>
			<osnews:numComments>63</osnews:numComments>
			<osnews:related>http://www.osnews.com/topics/47</osnews:related>
			<osnews:kind>News</osnews:kind>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Talking Point: Overlapping Windows</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/24727/Talking_Point_Overlapping_Windows/</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/story/24727/Talking_Point_Overlapping_Windows/</guid>
			<description>Back in the 80s, a GUI paradigm called WIMP (Windows, Icons, Mouse, Pointer) began to establish itself as the new way in which most people interacted with a computer. When it comes to one of the most significant elements of that system, overlapping windows, I'm beginning to wonder, has it had its day?</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2011 17:19:19 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (David Adams)</author>
			<category>Graphics, User Interfaces</category>
			<osnews:numComments>27</osnews:numComments>
			<osnews:related>http://www.osnews.com/topics/47</osnews:related>
			<osnews:kind>News</osnews:kind>
			<osnews:submitter><a href="http://www.osnews.com/user/rhyder">rhyder</a></osnews:submitter>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Pinta 1.0 Released, Reviewed</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/24724/Pinta_1_0_Released_Reviewed/</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/story/24724/Pinta_1_0_Released_Reviewed/</guid>
			<description>"Pinta, a 'lightweight' open source raster image editor, turned 1.0 on April 27, offering Linux users another choice for simple image editing. Pinta is intended to be a clone of Paint.NET, the Windows-only raster editor written in .NET. As such, it uses Mono under the hood, but it gains the ability to run equally well on Linux, Mac OS X, or Windows. Is it a replacement for GIMP or Krita? That depends on what you need to do." What I like about Pinta is that I actually caused its creation in the first place.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2011 21:53:32 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Thom Holwerda)</author>
			<category>Graphics, User Interfaces</category>
			<osnews:numComments>28</osnews:numComments>
			<osnews:related>http://www.osnews.com/topics/47</osnews:related>
			<osnews:kind>News</osnews:kind>
			<osnews:submitter><a href="http://www.osnews.com/user/kragil">kragil</a></osnews:submitter>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Transparent Monitor Embedded in Window Glass</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/24570/Transparent_Monitor_Embedded_in_Window_Glass/</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/story/24570/Transparent_Monitor_Embedded_in_Window_Glass/</guid>
			<description>Samsung has developed a completely transparent solar-powered monitor that's designed to be used with ambient light.  Though they're marketing it as  a television, it's almost certainly going to be used initially as displays in commercial areas, and it apparently is also a touch-screen, opening it up for the coolest kind of kiosk you've ever used.  See a video after the jump.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2011 15:06:46 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (David Adams)</author>
			<category>Graphics, User Interfaces</category>
			<osnews:numComments>34</osnews:numComments>
			<osnews:related>http://www.osnews.com/topics/47</osnews:related>
			<osnews:kind>News</osnews:kind>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Four Open Source Online Image Editors</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/24552/Four_Open_Source_Online_Image_Editors/</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/story/24552/Four_Open_Source_Online_Image_Editors/</guid>
			<description>If you use a photo editor to crop or convert your images, or to improve brightness, color balance and contrast, then you probably don't need a professional image processing suite. There are tons of web-based graphic editors that are available for free. However, if you are looking for self-hosted, open source solutions, you should definitely go in a different direction. Here's a list of four open source, self hosted online graphic editors.</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2011 20:21:59 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (David Adams)</author>
			<category>Graphics, User Interfaces</category>
			<osnews:numComments>1</osnews:numComments>
			<osnews:related>http://www.osnews.com/topics/47</osnews:related>
			<osnews:kind>News</osnews:kind>
			<osnews:submitter>Pawel Wolniewicz</osnews:submitter>
		</item>
	
	</channel>
</rss>

