Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 28th Feb 2006 18:20 UTC, submitted by JustThinkIt
Permalink for comment 100976
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-02-05
"all the applications and utilities I use under Linux are free as in beer and as in speech, while when I used Windows my software consisted of a mixmatch collection of free software, freeware, shareware and proprietary software. Now I can enjoy (and sometimes suffer because of
a free environment, from the OS to the last applet in my panel. Can you do the same under Windows? I don't think so. "
What stop me on using Windows with :
- Eclipse + GCC for my development projects
- Open Office for my documents writing
- Firefox for my web browsing
- Thunderbird for my emails
- GIMP to touch my pictures
- Apache for my web server
etc etc.
I can use pretty much all of the softwares available under Linux on my Windows (actually, I *do* use all of the softwares I just listed, with the exception of Visual Studio that I prefere instead of Eclipse).
So I can use 99% of all the softwares available under Linux. But then I can get Windows specific application if I chose to (in my case Visual Studio), because I have more freedom than under Linux.
Your other points are valid. I was only talking about your argument on having "free softwares" under Linux and not Windows.
Edited 2006-03-03 08:07