Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 7th Mar 2006 21:32 UTC
Permalink for comment 102479
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/25/13 0:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 23:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Howard Fosdick on 05/24/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-06
I honestly expect AMD's highend dual core chips to beat Intel's quad core ones.
Sorry to break your expectations, but...
http://www.anandtech.com/tradeshows/showdoc.aspx?i=2713
2.66 Ghz Conroe is upto 20-40% faster than 2.8Ghz FX-60.
I forecast lots more missed quarterly sales quotas before Intel gets a clue and fixes its root problem, an on chip memory controller
Intel CSI interconnect bus will appear in 2007. As for now, well, the 1333MHz FSB is not so bad.