Linked by Eugenia Loli on Fri 10th Mar 2006 01:16 UTC, submitted by danwarne
Permalink for comment 103040
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/25/13 0:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 23:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Howard Fosdick on 05/24/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-11-16
AFAIK, all Itanium based computers boot with EFI.
Microsoft has a version of Windows XP for the Itanium - I assume it wouldn't be too hard for them to merge their EFI support from this version into an 80x86 OS.
OS X is (AFAIK) mostly portable code, and could probably be ported to Itanium very easily.
Can we have some conspiracy theories based on this please?
I'll start - what if Microsoft, Apple and Intel secretly agreed to shift the IT industry from 80x86 to Itanium in the next 5 years? Microsoft would gain (no need to worry about legacy hardware or figuring out how to convince people to buy Vista's successor), Intel would gain (no need to worry about AMD), and MS/Intel could make it sound good to Apple by offering continued software for OS X (MS Office, etc) and discounted hardware (to make it easier for Apple to compete with white box suppliers).
Actually this make sense - mutual benefits for the companies involved, and the consumers are forced into upgrading (more benefits for the companies involved). It'd be $$$ for all.
Sorry - couldn't help myself... :-)