Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 10th Mar 2006 12:29 UTC, submitted by Moule
Privacy, Security, Encryption It's official, boys and girls: it's easier to kick in a door when it's open. "A test has revealed that a Linux server is far less likely to be compromised. In fact, unpatched Red Hat and SuSE servers were not breached at all during a six-week trial, while the equivalent Windows systems were compromised within hours. However, patching does make a difference. Patched versions of Windows fared far better, remaining untouched throughout the test, as did the Red Hat and Suse deployments."
Permalink for comment 103384
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
by SmallPotato on Sat 11th Mar 2006 01:40 UTC
Member since:

I did virtually the same test some time in 2005 in my office. I tested the connectivity of my ISP after a network failure on their side. I put a freshly installed Windows 2000 (no SP) on the net, configured the IP address stuff, opened Internet Explorer to the default first page, and browse the web for a while.


The machine got infected with a virus before I unplug the network. Within 5 to 10 minutes I think.

I spotted it because I opened regedit after I unplug the network, and I found a malicious entry in HKLM...Run.

"Very nice", I told the technician of the ISP, "The network is working correctly. Both outbound and inbound connection work now."

Reply Score: 1