Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 12th Mar 2006 18:40 UTC, submitted by kaiwai
Permalink for comment 103879
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/20/13 6:17 UTC, submitted by MOS6510
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 23:02 UTC, submitted by M.Onty
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 22:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-06
WinFX sounds great, so do the new APIs, the new Media Player, Internet Explorer, and everything else....
but think about it...
Vista is a massive behemoth, in terms of code quantity, sheer megabytes, and system requirements. It incorporates countless new, deeply-integrated software packages that were developed in a a number of disparate Microsoft divisions, and that are now being smushed together and rushed out the door at short notice. In addition, every program that's based on .NET will use (I'd estimate) 1/3rd more resources than a normal program since it's in a virtual machine, plus the number of 3rd party .NET programs out there will only increase, meaning even more resource consumption and slowdown. All this, plus a disk and processor-intensive disk-indexing service will be running full-time in the background.
With all this in mind, with Microsoft's record for stability (or the lack thereof), and judging by the beta testers' reports of slowdowns and crashes, it seems to me that it'll take a miracle for Vista to run crash-and-freeze-free on any machine, much less on my 3-year-old (yet still quite capable) laptop.