Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 12th Mar 2006 18:40 UTC, submitted by kaiwai
Talk, Rumors, X Versus Y OSNews regular Kaiwai takes a superficial look at Vista and MacOS 10.4/10.5, and concludes: "To say that the changes in Windows Vista are only skin deep is missinformed to say the least; spend some time reading those sources I have listed, and even if you don't have a desire to run Windows Vista or particular interested in Windows based technology, it does provide some good resources explaining the changes and rationale behind those choices made. So from a purely technical point of view, Windows Vista is actually looking a whole lot more interesting than what the detractors have been saying in the computer press about the current direction."
Permalink for comment 104092
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: XPS
by Ford Prefect on Mon 13th Mar 2006 22:33 UTC in reply to "RE: XPS"
Ford Prefect
Member since:
2006-01-16

So what do you mean by native? Alike GDI, which was "supported natively" and resulted in drivers converting in whatever stinky format nobody could understand, even windows not?

A really open standard which is supported natively would result in the following cool side-effect: You can pipe whatever XPS file you have under whatever OS you have to your printer, without the need of a driver for it.

This is already possible with Postscript, while cheap printers don't support it and give us driver hell. *If* XPS would really be an *open standard* supported by cheap printers *natively* we could really benefit from it. If not - which I clearly doubt - it won't benefit anyone.

Reply Parent Score: 1