Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 7th Jul 2005 14:41 UTC
Permalink for comment 1058
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/25/13 0:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 23:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Howard Fosdick on 05/24/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-06
Gnome is bloat.The Fedora core4 when I entered the gnome default environment,it consumed memory more than the kde 3.4 in fc4.
Memory, relative to the other parts of a computer is cheap. The difference between GNOME and KDE is at most 50-100MB. At today's prices, that's less than $10 worth of RAM. There is no way that is expensive for anyone with a computer.
gnome's no future
I think GNOME and KDE both have very bright futures. I recently installed Fedora Core 4 on my new computer, and I have to say that GNOME 2.10 is a nice environment. I've only been using it a couple of days, but it is clean, uncluttered, and very stable (I haven't encountered a bug yet). It's also pretty fast, though anything less would be inexcusable on a dual-core athlon64. It's certainly one of the more enjoyable user experiences I've had with a computer in the last few years.