Linked by Eugenia Loli on Mon 20th Mar 2006 07:31 UTC
Permalink for comment 105998
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/20/13 6:17 UTC, submitted by MOS6510
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 23:02 UTC, submitted by M.Onty
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 22:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-02-06
As much as I hate playing devils advocate on that matter (I am a linux-only user for like 5 or 6 years now) I beg to differ.
I am a linux user and computer programmer for a long time and I would have to say that EVERY computer system is hackable. If linux is not being attacked by malware today is just because there is not enough interest in writing such tools.
A few things I give credit for linux not being hacked these days are:
1) not enough market share to create interest in abusing users (not enough users to scam)
2) it's too much of a moving target. so the effort is bigger to create linux malware than to windows malware... the same as it is to write conventional proprietary software.
So... as "harder" as the system is to hack, it is always "easy enough" provided that there are enough people trying to hack it (when talking to desktop systems, that is).