Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 29th Mar 2006 11:28 UTC, submitted by anonymous
OpenBSD "Even if you don't use OpenBSD, you're likely to be benefiting from it unknowingly. If you're using Solaris, SCO UnixWare, OS X, SUSE Linux, or Red Hat Enterprise Linux, chances are you're using the OpenBSD-developed OpenSSH for secure shell access to remote machines. If so many are using this software, why are so few paying for it? Official responses (and non-responses) from Sun Microsystems, IBM, Novell, and Red Hat are below, but if you're one of the freeloaders who hasn't contributed to OpenBSD or OpenSSH, what's your excuse?"
Permalink for comment 109402
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Structure
by tony on Wed 29th Mar 2006 20:43 UTC in reply to "RE: Structure"
Member since:

It hasn't happened because everybody thinks it's a good idea and is more than happy to suggest it, but too lazy to get off theirs duffs and make it happen. Theo and crew are coders, not paper pushers and they deem their time better spent on coding. From what I hear, it really is a significant amount of work.

I serve on a board right now as treasurer (commercial), and it's not that much work. And calling the work paper pushing I don't think is fair. In any organization, there's always some paperwork that needs to be done. Every entity, either individual or incorporated, has some paperwork associated with it. For example, if Theo is taking donations in his name, then he has to account for donations in some way so that he doesn't run afoul of the Canadian tax authorties. You need to do it anyway, and setting up a system can simplify the process so the "necessary evil" doesn't get in the way. Also, it helps with transparency, so everyone knows you're running an honest and tight ship.

And as for starting one up, I'd be happy to do it.

Reply Parent Score: 1