Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 29th Mar 2006 21:54 UTC, submitted by mcsimpson
Permalink for comment 109637
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/25/13 0:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 23:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Howard Fosdick on 05/24/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-01-06
the Mach base of OS-X definitely doesn't help it much.
Basically you've got one "hack" OS (XP) compared with another OS using an antiquated 1980's core. Neither of them are well equipped to handle multiple cores.
Apple needs a kick in the nads for not adopting BeOS. Forward looking design for it's time. And it would have been cheaper than acquiring NeXT & Steve Jobs.