Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 30th Mar 2006 15:51 UTC, submitted by george
Permalink for comment 109666
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 20:46 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 17:32 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-26
He rails out against the "Open Source" licenses. Perhaps there are a lot of them. Only a few are popularly used, and one of these must surely fill a particular need.
However, there are a large number of 'proprietary' licenses, as each separate piece of software one buys seems to have its own license written just for that piece of code. Many businesses will likely settle on just one or two, maybe. But each business will also have their own license, and not use the license of another business.
So, yeah. There are a lot of licenses all over, and this is not really just an "open source" problem.