Linked by Eugenia Loli on Mon 3rd Apr 2006 06:44 UTC
Permalink for comment 110668
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-11-16
With all these different hypervisors, wouldn't it be nice if you could run several hypervisors on the same machine? I want a "meta-hypervisor" running multiple hypervisors running multiple OSs running multiple applications (with multi-threading).
Wouldn't portable software running on an OS that doesn't crash make more sense? I'm wondering if the need for virtualization represents some form of failure in the IT industry...