Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 7th Jul 2005 19:16 UTC
Permalink for comment 1124
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 13:17 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 12:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/15/13 23:03 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-06
As for the PPC970 architectural advantages, I don't think, in practical terms, it is better than what AMD has to offer (I know, Apple is going with Intel
. Of course, the G5 wins in some departments, but you have Intel/AMD winning in many other.
I agree with that statement completely. From a programmer's perspective (not an ASM programmer's perspective, mind you), I think the K8 is the nicest architecture out there. Opterons are among the fastest chips available for both integer and FPU code, they've got a good SMP arrangement, they've got nice big caches, a decent number of registers, and are relatively insensitive to instruction scheduling. Probably not the best in any one category, but a very good point in the design space.