Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 11th Apr 2006 17:34 UTC, submitted by george
Permalink for comment 113877
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/25/13 0:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 23:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Howard Fosdick on 05/24/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-08-20
Good point. Of course, what they ought to be using is Xen, since they integrated it into their own SuSE product.
You can't run windows on xen without 1) the new processors with virtualization support and 2) xen 3 (xen 2 still requires a modified kernel).
#1 would require rolling out new hardware to all their customers which would be a waste of money when they could just dual boot.
#2 isn't ready yet. I believe xensource are the only ones who have gotten windows running on xen and it certainly wasn't an option when they started the conversion.