Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 12th Apr 2006 18:30 UTC
Permalink for comment 114293
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 23:02 UTC, submitted by M.Onty
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 22:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-08-20
I believe that it is possible to be a little too obsessed with future release schedules. For crap's sake, debating about a release schedule two versions after the product that's not even been released yet? When's the next American election coming? Who's debating who's gonna get elected 8 years after that?
From the article:
Will pushing back Vista's release-to-manufacturing date by a few weeks or months play havoc with these already tentative schedules?
Sounds like the author is praying for Microsoft to fail and believes that if she wishes it hard enough, it might come true :roll;