Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 16th Apr 2006 15:36 UTC
Permalink for comment 115347
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 20:46 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 17:32 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-12-03
NT has sophisticated IPC mechanisms (such as APC and LPC) and most non-essential services live outside the kernel.
But you're missing the point (i didn't say that NT doesn't have IPC, it's just NOT USED for communication between different kernel components, because they live in the same address space - the upper 2 gigs) - in microkernel "nonessential services" are anything but the scheduler/IPC.
YOU CANNOT SEPARATE ANY EXECUTIVE NT KERNEL COMPONENT INSIDE A USER-MODE PROCESS.
The desktop is NOT integrated into the kernel...
I didn't claim it was. You seem to be constantly proving something I didn't say, in order to apper correct in other things.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ignoratio_elenchi
Anyway, I would like to hear in just which ways is NT more microkernelish than, say Linux? :-)