Linked by Eugenia Loli on Tue 18th Apr 2006 17:49 UTC
Permalink for comment 116133
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 13:17 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 12:06 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-08-22
"No, but I guarantee you that speaks for the majority."
Good argument. I trust you because you guarantee it.
"Refusing propietary drivers because they are not open source IS politics, whether you like it or not."
Protecting freedom is NOT politics, it's principle. How you persuade others to follow your principles is politics. I don't see the kernel developers trying to convince anyone, just sticking to their ideas.
It's nice how you think refusing proprietary drivers is politics, where allowing them is not. Twisted and manipulative, but nice. I guess you fell for the proprietary driver politics. You know, the one where owners of proprietary drivers say their way is the right way, and any other way is just politics.