Linked by Eugenia Loli on Tue 18th Apr 2006 17:49 UTC
Permalink for comment 116274
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-12-15
Perhaps, but I would have thought a proper cohesive way to move forward would have been unity. To me one of the so-called benefits of open source software is also its detriment - fragmentation - making the job of developers more difficult.
I really find it difficult to understand the logic behind having the same piece of software in more than one fork of compatibility just for the sake of having to support multiple "variations" of what is almost the same OS.