Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 22nd Apr 2006 16:55 UTC, submitted by anonymous
Permalink for comment 117440
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 13:17 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 12:06 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-02-04
"That's a joke. You're basically saying someone can't like and use products from multiple companies or they are admitting one company's products are not "good enough"."
Well, Kinda, Sorta, Ummm, YES!
I switched to Linux about 7 years ago. I promote it's use as well as that of OSS.
Firewall - IPCOP
FileServer - Ubuntu Server
Workstation - Ubuntu
Wifes Workstation - Win2k / Ubuntu
I use all OSS software, EXCEPT ONE, Opera. My wife dual boots, but still makes the statement that Linux and OSS is not good enough for exclusive use. Her opinion of the state of Linux.
I use a closed source browser and everything else OSS. The rest of the browsers, OSS or Otherwise, ARE NOT GOOD ENOUGH in my opinion. I think OSS and Linux are excellant with the exception of the craptastic browsers.
If you run a website that fanboys about how wonderful a product is and you don't actually run the software, instead choosing a rival product, you are in fact stating that what you are promoting IS NOT GOOD ENOUGH for you to bother using.
Windows Rocks and Windows Rules, oh, but I run a Linux network??? Sorry! That gets a big zero in credibility!