Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 24th Apr 2006 14:05 UTC, submitted by CrimsonScythe
Apple The 17" MacBook Pro has just been released. The 17" model has Firewire 800 and 8x dual layer Superdrive, both of which the 15.4" version lacks. The new MacBook Pro was presented during the NAB2006. The machine will cost $2799,- in the US, or round and about EUR 2879,- (differs per country) in the EU, or GBP 1999,- if you live in the UK.
Permalink for comment 117930
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[7]: What A Joke
by rayiner on Tue 25th Apr 2006 01:22 UTC in reply to "RE[6]: What A Joke"
Member since:

If you whant to categorize it as 60% thicker that way , I prefer the total space volume.

This is stupid. What other way is there to categorize thickness than the actual thickness?

Its whats inside + software and service that make it at that price. The form could account for a small part of it but not the 900$ difference.

Even ignoring OS X, the Macbook is comparably priced to other machines in its price class. The 1" form-factor might not add $900 to the materials cost, but it does add a very large amount to the market price, based on what people are willing to pay for machines that thin.

Personnal preference and older machine

Dell's older machines (my XPS D300) are a lot higher quality then their newer ones. And "personal preference" has jack to do with things. Dell uses cheap plastics in their machines, plain and simple.

I dont think the Dell people had that kind of test in mind when they designed there laptop.

What the hell do you mean? You don't think they intended on people closing the lids when they designed the machines?

I can buy more cesna with a hell lot less money ...

And a fleet of 10,000 Cessna's as air superiority fighters does what for you? It's a completely pointless statement.

Tried to play oblivion or any PC game on that MacBook Pro ?

Since the Macs can run Windows...

I am going to wait for the Dell price team to adapt to it first.

What does that even mean?

Really , It rather prooved that there whas no point in making a comparaison on anything you offered.

The machines I used as comparisons are ones similar to the Macbook Pro. When deciding between a Macbook Pro and a Windows machine, these will be the machines in the comparison, not machines like the E1705. The E1705 you linked to was the pointless comparison --- if you're looking for a 1" laptop, you won't want the E1705, and if you're in the market for a $1000 laptop, you're not looking at the Macbook.

Reply Parent Score: 5