Linked by Eugenia Loli on Mon 1st May 2006 03:03 UTC
Permalink for comment 119856
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 20:46 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 17:32 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-12-03
Because Linux and UNIX have been running on dual

core (and 64-bit platforms) for far longer than NT,
ergo they "embraced" it much earlier.
Oh please, NT ran on 64b Alpha AXP ever since the first release in '93. Moreover - it was developed on i860 (N10) simulator in '89, which was marketed as 64b (although it wasn't truly, but that's Intel's marketing crap
And more important thing - it was SMP-ready from the start.
When did the linux go fully preemtpive and got rid of lock_kernel() after almost every syscall? In 2002? LOL
And the FBSD of the "Giant" mutex?