Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 3rd May 2006 16:03 UTC, submitted by Moulinneuf
Permalink for comment 120872
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-05-04
Ah, ok.. in that sense I agree with you.
As for iLife, I believe most people never acknowledge this when comparing the price of an Apple computer with the price of another computer. Of course, you get iLife and (probably) pay its price whether you want it or not. But I believe that Apple wants to offer the consumer a "complete" product, a kind of 'all-in' package: hardware+software for doing the stuff the "average" user needs. And their software and hardware is decent quality. I think their idea is that you buy a computer 'package' at Apple, come home, unpack it and can start doing most "normal" stuff out of the box.
I think it's a model you either like or hate.