Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 5th May 2006 19:54 UTC
Permalink for comment 121608
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-08-18
Fair comment. It's from a <personal_opinion> *cosmetic* point of view I prefer QT </personal_opinion>. That's interesting about the licensing though. So no chance for a version of Firefox built with QT?

If you're interested about the Firefox thing it's Firefox's (save/load) dialogues that bug me; they're always to small, hard to use etc. But thats running it under FreeBSD, I'm sure you Linux folk have that sorted