Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 7th May 2006 14:05 UTC, submitted by Mystilleef
Benchmarks Jasjeet Sekhon benchmarked Linux and MacOS X on the MacBook Pro using his statistical software, and finds that "Linux is found to be much faster than Apple's OS X for statistical computing. For example, in one benchmark Linux is more than twice as fast." Earlier, he ran tests on a G5 and an Opteron, and conlcuded: "Those results were terrible for OS X and not particularly good for the G5 (970) chip. For example, my 2.7 pound Pentium-M Linux laptop is faster than my 44 pound G5 running OS X. The floating point performance of the 970 chip leaves much to be desired, but OS X makes the performance problem significantly worse."
Permalink for comment 121968
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
dusanyu
Member since:
2006-01-21

"If it's so fisher-price then why is the KDE team cloning the XP interface down to every last details? It's because it works fine."

This is also why most linux users use GNOME. Just look at most distros most of them use GNOME as the default
(good bye karma)

This is why i stoped useing KDE 2 years ago and started useing GNOME

(good bye karma)

Reply Parent Score: 2