Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 7th May 2006 19:17 UTC
Permalink for comment 122524
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/20/13 6:17 UTC, submitted by MOS6510
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 23:02 UTC, submitted by M.Onty
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 22:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-02-05
"However, I find it a rather childish reaction for an editor writing an opinion piece to tell those who disagree with him not to read his opinion piece. "
This is simple freedom of speech. Everybody's free to speak his mind, and everyone else is free to listen or not. What is childish is your reaction to an editorial. Please get a life.
"Thom, pulling out wrong and stupid analogies out of somewhere is just a very bad excuse for having a real argument."
Thom's analogies are perfectly valid. They only show how stupid and nonsense your argumentation is.
"The only problem is that you still have not provided one argument why this should be the case and instead have again tried to avoid addressing the issue at hand. Pathetic."
You're talking about yourself, right? Religious moron.