Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 12th May 2006 20:29 UTC, submitted by Mark
Permalink for comment 124125
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 13:17 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 12:06 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-01-28
In my ThinkPad I got better results with this, comparing to FC5:
- Intel Wireless NIC: Detected but need manual configuration in FC5. Automatically detected and configured in Suse 10.1
- Network Connection: Asked for "keyring password" - each time I wanted to access my wireless network in FC5. No "keyring password" needed in Suse.
- Hibernation & Sleep: Quite bogus in FC5. Works in Suse.
- Beagle: Had to start indexing after each reboot -tried to apply the hack posted on developer's web page without success-. Works fine on Suse.
- Desktop 3D effects: Unusable on FC5, faster on Suse but still not for everyday use.
Overall both are great distros but on my particular hardware configuration Suse wins so far.