Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 16th May 2006 22:13 UTC, submitted by adstro
Permalink for comment 125254
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 13:17 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 12:06 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-11-16
The linked article begins with:
"Sun Microsystems is planning to release the source code of the Java programming language ..."
The same thing said on CNET:
<quote>the event won't see developers get their hands on the source code for the actual Java programming language</quote>
From "Java inches closer to open source":
http://news.com.com/Java+inches+closer+to+open+source/2100-1007_3-6...
<quote>Attendees to JavaOne will not be getting their hands on the source code for the Java language</quote>
From "Sun promises to open-source Java":
http://news.com.com/Sun+promises+to+open-source+Java/2100-7344_3-60...
Correct me if I'm wrong:
The source code for Sun JDK/JRE - Sun's implementation of Java - has been available for a long time under these licenses:
http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/source_license.html
Anyone can get the source immediately under those license.
So the issue here is not "release the source code", but rather choosing a "Open Source" license for Java so that it becomes a "Free Software".
( I am not a Free software zealot, just get tired explaining that the source code is already available. )