Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 16th May 2006 22:43 UTC
Permalink for comment 125290
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/25/13 0:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 23:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Howard Fosdick on 05/24/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-01-02
First, they quit the cheap stuff with the Athlon, which have regularly been up there with their Pentium counterparts, except the few times they couldn't keep up (Barton until Clawhammer). I'd love to see dual-core Semprons, though.
Yes, we will have 10+ core CPUs. Not in desktops in a couple years, but surely in servers around 5-7 years.
Software has not caught up [for general use]. But it will. Games and encoding software (including compression!) are catching up right now.
BTW, those four cores are for a server chip, where software can use its power as soon as it is released.