Linked by Eugenia Loli on Thu 18th May 2006 08:23 UTC
PC-BSD "PC-BSD aims to be an easy to use desktop operating system, based on FreeBSD. As many Linux users, I have little or no knowledge about FreeBSD. I heard many rumors about it. I read about it and about its history. I even tried it a little while ago and, although I appreciated some aspects of it, I came to the conclusion that it wasn't ready for the desktop. So when I read the announcement of PC-BSD being released, I decided to have a look at it." Read the review at LinuxForums.
Permalink for comment 125843
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
by lopisaur on Thu 18th May 2006 13:36 UTC
Member since:

Just a few rants about this "review" (I'm in a lousy mood this morning):
- "The boot menu offers a few options. It probably allows to boot an already installed image, or to perform a text mode installation. I decided to go with the default choice." The guy could at least read the boot menu.
- Are there any grassy hills on Microsoft's website?
- People that don't know what language their keyboard's layed out for probably have no business installing an OS.
- I never heard the term "mono-user"...
- I know this point about the ports collection has been made a million times, but what's so difficult about cd /usr/ports/APPNAME, make install clean? I know it's not something you'd expect a novice to be able to do, but a serious reviewer should at least look into the fact that ports DO work in PC-BSD, not "suppose" they do.
- At least his final sentence is nice, although PC-BSD is not supposed to be the same animal as FreeBSD (at least not on the outside).

Reply Score: 3