Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 19th May 2006 13:13 UTC, submitted by Brad Wardell
Permalink for comment 126231
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.





Member since:
2006-05-18
The enterprise won't be migrating to Vista anytime soon for those exact reasons.
Vista has little to offer over 2003 server, which has little to offer over 2000 Server - speaking from a practicality standpoint.
Exchange will determine who upgrades and when. Big-budgeted corporate rollouts will always be around, but when a company has to decide between upgrading 500MHz user workstations (running a mix of NT ^still^ and 2000), or upgrading their Windows and email server licenses, it is a tough call.
NT is dead, and they're killing 2000, but it's hard when so many companies are reluctant to change, especially when they have to change *everything* in order to make it pay off.
When you take into consideration how many companies rely on third party hacks like Ghost and Anti-Virus (not to mention all the imaging, updates, etc) and you tell them that they will have to come up with something new - all at once - I'd bet that not too many IT managers will be jumping on Vista.