Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 22nd May 2006 17:41 UTC, submitted by Joel Dahl
Permalink for comment 127023
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 13:17 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 12:06 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-03-20
sure, almost every OS has upgrade mechanisms, and often there are more than one.
the problem is that, theoretical or aesthetic beauty aside, experience has shown that the rpm/apt method of upgrading packages or even kernels has proven to be much more successful than anything offered by the *BSD family.
the point here is not that no mechanism is provided, but that through experience, portupgrade and the like have failed too often.