Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 2nd Jun 2006 19:51 UTC, submitted by Tyr.
Permalink for comment 130302
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-06
To be fair, OS X does its GPU thing perfectly fine on a GMA950 chipset, which is several times slower than even an X300 card. If Vista can't run well on what is really a decent GPU (1.2 gigapixels, pixel and vertex shaders, 6.4 GB/sec memory bus), then that indicates a problem with the system. A lot of people use integrated graphics (Intel is actually the GPU vendor with the largest market share), and an X300 is right about the performance level where integrated chips will be in the next couple of years.