Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 13th Jun 2006 12:08 UTC, submitted by Mapou
General Development "There is something fundamentally wrong with the way we create software. Contrary to conventional wisdom, unreliability is not an essential characteristic of complex software programs. In this article, I will propose a silver bullet solution to the software reliability and productivity crisis. The solution will require a radical change in the way we program our computers. I will argue that the main reason that software is so unreliable and so hard to develop has to do with a custom that is as old as the computer: the practice of using the algorithm as the basis of software construction. I will argue further that moving to a signal-based, synchronous software model will not only result in an improvement of several orders of magnitude in productivity, but also in programs that are guaranteed free of defects, regardless of their complexity."
Permalink for comment 133084
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Track record?
by corentin on Tue 13th Jun 2006 19:18 UTC
corentin
Member since:
2005-08-08

*Why* should we read the rants of someone who can show no track record of complex software development (an operating system, a compiler, a language, a RDBMS, etc.)?

When I read something written by people heavily involved in Multics, Unix, Plan9, BSD, Linux, NT or whatever I tend to trust them.

There already is a practical solution to the software crisis: it's called (real) engineering. And buying snake oil technology is not something a decent engineer would do in order to solve problems.

Reply Score: 4