Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 4th Aug 2005 14:07 UTC, submitted by sonic1001
Permalink for comment 13604
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-06
I just wish more companies would follow this route (Novell's move with OpenSUSE is a good example). :-)
Such a interaction can benefit both company and OSS.Development cycles can decrease and most end-users have a better chance of getting newer more advanced features
sooner.
For the ones who still think MS takes security serious and reacts adequately to new threads have a look at this one:A vulnerability in default installations of the affected software that allows malicious code to be executed with minimal user interaction.(remotely)
Affected:win2000,XP,win2003
http://www.eeye.com/html/research/upcoming/20050329.html
MS has been informed in March and is now 68 days overdue.
I would say that's a genuine advantage (not).I have never experienced such an overdue with any Linux distro and *BSD.