Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 25th Jun 2006 11:48 UTC, submitted by RJay
Permalink for comment 137020
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.





Member since:
2005-10-02
I'm not aware of such statements.
I am however aware that it's not a classical FS in any low-level sense, but I'm not aware they have claimed that it's not a FS in a high-level sense.
The article clearly shows that WinFS _was_ intended as a FS.
How come the developers are saying it is dead as a high-level file system if it wasn't intended to be such a thing?