Linked by Eugenia Loli on Thu 29th Jun 2006 01:33 UTC
Permalink for comment 138650
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-02-15
Wrong, wrong wrong. Corporate buyers want a Blackberry's functionality. The ability to install applications doesn't even come up on their radar.
Palm would strongly dispute this argument, as the ability to customize aps to an industry is one of the stronger selling points of PalmOS based phones.
If any of that mattered huge platforms like PalmOS wouldn't be suddenly killed. Handset makers would, at least within their own line, standardize on a platform.
PalmOS hasn't been "suddenly killed." PalmSource has slowly bled it to death by not providing a reasonable update in over 5 years.
Handset makers are moving to standarize on a platform within their own line. Both Nokia and Motorola have extensive in-house programs to reduce the number of platforms.