Linked by Eugenia Loli on Thu 29th Jun 2006 01:33 UTC
Permalink for comment 138701
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-12-09
I for one would ADORE a mediocre phone that had:
A) Great reception.
B) Infinite (or simply nigh-infinite) battery life
C) A simple, useful ringtone
D) Answering machine functions
E) Is good and cheap, considering it's high-hazard life.
None of these awesome features require an OS, per se.
Instead I see more and more $200 battery hogs that are plagued with dropped signals and play obnoxious hip-hop snippits through a .05 inch piezo and are marketed as high-dollar fashion accessories more than telecommunication devices. I have never, EVER caught anyone "working" on a cell phone. They mostly just talk on them and drive badly doing so.
Sheesh. FORGET an OS, I just want a PHONE!
By the by, the NOKIA 2115i that I use right now is the best phone I have ever seen. If it had better reception, I'd marry it.