Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 3rd Jul 2006 22:06 UTC
Permalink for comment 140161
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/25/13 0:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 23:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Howard Fosdick on 05/24/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-09-25
PC-BSD is coming along nicely.
Easy installation, good default setup, multimedia codecs, java, printing, etc. all good.
I do think they should incorporate a graphical ports front-end similar to the one used by DesktopBSD. Why not give users the extra choice, especially since there's only a small selection of FreeBSD's 15,000+ ports available in PBI format?
Also, they need to work on making GTK fonts nicer by default - again DesktopBSD has the edge here, since it automatically runs the clearlooks theme as soon as it is installed (and I believe it is automatically installed if you install the DVD version of DesktopBSD).
Both PC-BSD and DesktopBSD failed to configure X correctly - I had to run xorgconfig and fix things manually. If there was a way for the installer to recognise when it needed input (e.g. 'What monitor do you have?') and ask for help, this would be nice, too.
I also had to disable my USB controller in my PC's BIOS to get PC-BSD & DesktopBSD to install (re-enabling it afterwards, of course). This doesn't happen when installing FreeBSD itself.
But overall, PC-BSD is making remarkable progress, especially considering the relatively limited manpower they currently enjoy. Well done!